|

◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊
Visit
Buzzflash.com to read news the
Bush junta does not want you to read. |
| |
George Bush's Biggest Lie:
His "Military Record"
Summary. George Bush likes to leave the impression that he understands
military service and military people. His phony
carrier landing was a laughable attempt to make him appear to be a "top
gun." The fact is that Bush mentions his own shaky, questionable, shady
military record ONLY when he is forced to say something about his "service" --
and then he dissembles and evades.
The short version
The facts of George W. Bush's military service are a slap in the face of anyone served
honorably. The short version is this:
- During the Vietnam War, George Bush used his father's influence to get into the closed
Texas Air National Guard.
- He underwent basic flight training in an obsolete jet aircraft.
- He then had a period of over two years in which he was absent from the unit and only
attended drills occasionally.
- He dropped out of the Guard before he completed his commitment.
- His military records have been sealed -- but not before some of the records were
obtained through the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA)
- Review of these records and interviews with former commanders and other officers from
the Texas Air National Guard reveal that George Bush hardly served with distinction and
honor -- in fact, he may have violated military rules.
Details of George Bush's "military service"
There are a number of sources that reveal the facts of Bush's "military
service."
The Skeleton Closet article
on Bush has a very long, documented section.
Molly Ivins' book, Shrub,
describes Bush's service with the Texas Guard.
The following article is quoted in full. This is the work of a retired Air Force
officer who knows the Air Force, knows military records, and -- above all -- knows what it
takes to fly jet aircraft. Here is a link
to the original article.
QUOTE
Bush's military record reveals grounding, two-year absence
- - - By Robert A. Rogers (USAF - Ret)
"I think that people need to be held responsible for the actions they take
in life. I think that's part of the need for a cultural change. We need to say that each
of us needs to be responsible for what we do."
- George W. Bush in the first Presidential debate, October 3, 2000.
"I did the duty necessary ... That's why I was honorably discharged"
- George W. Bush, May 23, 2000
From the beginning of his Presidential campaign, George W. Bush has forcefully and
repeatedly insisted that he faithfully fulfilled all his military obligations by serving
his time as a member of the Texas Air National Guard.
But the first independent investigation of Bush's military record by a former
Air National Guard pilot has revealed the following:
1. Pilot George W. Bush did not simply "give up flying" with two
years left to fly, as has been reported. Instead,
Bush was suspended and grounded, very possibly as a direct or indirect result of substance
abuse.
2. The crucial evidence - a Flight Inquiry Board - that would reveal the true
reasons for Bush's suspension, as
well as the punishment that was recommended, is missing from the records released so far.
If no such Board was
convened, this raises further questions of extraordinary favoritism.
3. Contrary to Bush's emphatic statements and several published reports, Bush never
actually reported in person
for the last two years of his service - in direct violation of two separate written
orders. Moreover, the lack of
punishment for this misconduct represents the crowning achievement of a military career
distinguished only by
favoritism.
This in-depth investigation and analysis of Bush's apparent misconduct over the last
two years of his six year obligation suggests that Bush did not fulfill all of his
military obligations to the Texas Air National Guard and to his country, contrary to his
repeated assertions.
Moreover, Bush's misconduct could have resulted in significant disciplinary action
by his Commanding Officer,
ranging in severity from temporary or permanent grounding, a career-damaging letter of
reprimand, to forced
reenlistment in the US Army (including active duty in Vietnam), to a less-than honorable
discharge.
These issues are not trivial, nor are they ancient history. This cloud of questions
goes to the heart of
George W. Bush's promises to restore honor and integrity to the White House, to strengthen
the military, and to speak
the plain truth on the campaign trail.
If Bush had received a less-than honorable discharge, it is safe to say that he
would not be the Republican
candidate for President today. But the absence of any sign of severe disciplinary action
in the records we obtained
raises serious questions that can only be answered if Bush himself requests the release of
his full military service
record.
Avoiding Vietnam through Preferential Treatment
George W. Bush graduated from Yale in May of 1968, at the height of the Vietnam War
when half a million young
American men were fighting for their country and dying at the rate of 350 per week. Bush,
who mostly distinguished
himself at Yale through his social activities, vocally supported the war. But he was not
prepared to put his own
life on the line. He had no desire "to be an infantry guy as a private in
Vietnam," he said.
Instead, Bush wanted to become a fighter pilot like his father, who flew heroic
combat missions in the Pacific during World War II. "I wanted to fly, and that was
the adventure I was seeking," he told the New York Times in July. Bush denies that he
was trying to avoid combat. "One could argue that [I] was trying to avoid being the
infantryman but my attitude was I'm taking the first
opportunity to become a pilot and jumped on that and did my time," he said.
But Bush did not join the full time active duty military. Instead, he chose to
enlist for "weekend warrior" duty in the Air National Guard, where he could
fulfill his military obligation far away from the risk of combat and pursue his civilian
career, including working in several Republican Senate campaigns. "Had my unit been
called I would have gone ... to Vietnam," he said. But like everyone else at the
time, he knew the chances of that happening were slim. And when his application form asked
about an overseas assignment, he checked "do not volunteer."
Competition for the few openings in the National Guard was intense, and there was a
waiting list of 100,000 nationally at the time. Bush took the Air Force officer and pilot
qualification tests on January 17, 1968. He scored 25%, the lowest possible passing grade
on the pilot aptitude portion. On his application form, he listed his "background
qualifications" as "none." But despite the waiting list,
his low score and his lack of qualifications, Bush was given a highly-coveted spot and was
sworn in on May 27 for a six-year commitment, taking a solemn oath to protect and defend
the U.S. Constitution and the United States of America.
Bush and his father have adamantly denied that he received preferential treatment,
despite the fact that his father was then a U.S. Representative from Texas and his
grandfather Prescott had been a prominent U.S. Senator from Connecticut. But the Speaker
of the House in Texas at the time, Ben Barnes, admitted under oath last year that he had
received a request from a longtime Bush family friend, Sidney Adger of Houston, to help
Bush get into the Air National Guard. Barnes further testified that he contacted
the head of the Texas Air National Guard, Brig. Gen. James Rose, to pass along Adger's
request.
When asked about this sworn testimony, Bush was evasive: "I have no idea and I
don't believe so," he said. But according to the Boston Globe, Bush "vaulted to
the top of a waiting list of 500."
This preferential treatment in gaining entry to the Air National Guard set the
pattern for Bush's treatment throughout his six-year obligation, including his rapid
promotion to pilot and 1st Lieutenant, his sudden disappearance from the skies with two
years left to fly, and his failure to report for a single day of duty in his final two
years contrary to two specific orders.
After he completed only six weeks of basic airman training, Bush received a
commission as a second lieutenant in the Texas Air National Guard. This was by means of a
'special appointment' by the commanding officer of his squadron, with the approval of a
panel of three senior officers. This 2nd Lt. commission was extraordinary, since it
normally required eight full semesters of college ROTC courses or eighteen months of
military service or completion of Air Force officer training school. It was so unusual
that Tom Hail, the Texas National Guard historian, told the Los Angeles Times that he
"never heard of that" except for flight surgeons.
Despite a score of only 25% on his pilot entrance aptitude test, Bush was then
assigned to flight school, a posting that was normally reserved to pilots graduating from
ROTC training or Air Force officer training. That was immediately followed by further
favoritism in being 'fast tracked' over those on the existing pilot applicant waiting list
into the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron, a standby
runway alert component of the 143rd Group, one of several tactical Guard units responsible
for defending the Southern coast of the Continental U.S. against attack.
Along with the rest of his squadron, Bush was trained to fly the missile-equipped
supersonic F-102 Delta Dart jet interceptor fighter. By July of 1970, Bush had earned his
wings and racked up approximately 300 hours of training flight time in the F-102. This
qualified him to fly the F-102 without an instructor, but was far short of the 500 hours
of experience required for volunteer active duty combat operations in Vietnam.
At this point in the Vietnam War, the US Air Force desperately needed additional
F-102 pilots to fly the dangerous reconnaissance missions so important to the fate of
American troops on the ground. With only a small amount of solo flying experience, Bush
applied for a voluntary three month Vietnam tour, perhaps counting on preferential
treatment once again to overcome his lack of readiness, or perhaps safe in the knowledge
that his request would certainly be rejected.
When Bush was summarily turned down for this volunteer active duty option, he was
left to fly as a "weekend warrior" in the Texas Air National Guard out of
Ellington AFB near Houston Texas. On November 3, 1970, while Bush's father was being
re-elected to Congress from Houston, Bush was promoted to 1st Lieutenant by Brig. General
Rose, the same man who got Bush into the Texas National Guard at the request of the Bush
family friend.
The Clouds Set In
The newly-released records reveal that 1st Lt. Bush was credited with 46 days of
flight duty from June 1970 to May 1971, expected Guard weekend duty and 'extra' runway
standby alert time for that year. However, that would be the last time that Bush fully met
his qualified jet fighter pilot obligation to serve four complete years as a fully trained
and qualified fighter pilot.
Beginning sometime after May of 1971, Bush stopped living up to his sworn obligation
to the Texas Air National Guard and thereby his country. By May of 1972, he was credited
with only 22 flight duty days, 14 days short of the minimum 36 days he owed the Guard for
that year. And then things went from bad to worse.
Astonishingly, Bush suddenly disappeared from the skies altogether near the start
of his fourth year. Bush flew for the last time in the cockpit of an F-102 in April of
1972. From that point on, Bush never flew again, in spite of the fact that he still had
two full years remaining of his six-year pilot service commitment. And on May 15, 1972,
Bush simply "cleared this base" according to a written report by one of his two
Squadron supervising officers, Lt. Col. William D. Harris Jr.
On May 24, Bush requested in writing a six-month transfer to an inactive postal
Reserve unit in Alabama, for the stated purpose of working on the campaign of a Republican
Senate candidate. If Bush had been temporarily transferred there, he would not have
continued flying until he returned to Texas, because the Alabama unit had no airplanes.
In fact, Bush's transfer request was denied by National Guard Bureau headquarters on
May 31 1972, and Bush should have returned to his base in Houston and continued with his
flying duties. Instead, he remained in Alabama until late in the fall. And something
critical happened on August 1, 1972 - George W. Bush was summarily suspended from flying
duties.
1. Was pilot George W. Bush suspended and grounded with two years left
to fly as a direct or indirect result of substance abuse?
"George Walker Bush is one member of the younger generation who doesn't get his
kicks from pot or hashish or speed ... As far as kicks are concerned, Lt. Bush gets his
from the roaring afterburner of the F-102."
-- Texas Air National Guard press release, March 1970.
There is no dispute that George W. Bush stopped flying with two years left in his
commitment to the Texas Air National Guard and to his country at the height of the Vietnam
War. The big question that has never been satisfactorily answered is: Why?
According to the Boston Globe - the only major publication that has examined the
last two years of Bush's military service in depth - Bush simply "gave up
flying" to spend six months on a Republican Senate campaign in Alabama.
But this explanation is highly suspect, because fully trained and currently
qualified pilots with two remaining years of flying obligation are rarely permitted to
simply "give up" without some form of disciplinary action beyond just
suspension.
A pilot's completion of his six-year obligation is especially important because of
the heavy investment the Government makes to provide jet fighter pilots with two full
years of active duty training. In today's money, the US Government paid close to a million
dollars to train 1st Lt. Bush in a highly complex supersonic aircraft.
One of Bush's newly-released service documents provides a significant clue to his
sudden disappearance from the skies. In a confirmation memo to the Secretaries of the Army
and Air Force dated September 29, 1972, Major General Francis Greenleaf, then Chief of the
National Guard Bureau in Washington DC, confirmed the suspension of 1st Lt. George W. Bush
from flying status. This written confirmation cites an earlier August 1, 1972 verbal order
of the TX 147th Group's Commanding Officer that suspended
and grounded Bush from flying duty for "his failure to accomplish annual medical
examination."
There are two ways to interpret this crucial memo: either 1st Lt. Bush took his
mandatory annual flight physical for pilots and failed it for some as-yet undisclosed
reason, or he refused to present himself in the first place to an Air Force Flight
Surgeon, who were readily available in almost every state.
Campaign officials originally brushed off this crucial event by suggesting that Bush
was simply unable to travel to Houston to visit his family physician. But the Boston Globe
reported that Air Force Flight Surgeons were assigned to Maxwell Air Force Base in
Montgomery Alabama, where he was then living.
More recently, campaign officials claimed that Bush did not technically need to take
his flight physical. "As he was not flying, there was no reason for him to take the
flight physical exam," campaign spokesman Don Bartlett told the London Times in June.
But this assertion is false, because Bush was technically still qualified to fly until
after his "failure to accomplish annual medical
examination," which led to his suspension and grounding. Moreover, Bush should have
been flying from his home base in Texas at the time of his scheduled annual physical in
August, because his request for a transfer to Alabama had been rejected on May 31.
Bush's spokesman admitted that Bush "knew the suspension would take
place" if he failed to complete his mandatory annual flight physical. But he writes
it off to mere red tape, saying "it was just a question of following the bureaucratic
procedure of the time."
But this suspension meant, at least momentarily, the end of his dream to be a pilot.
This was something he worked hard to achieve, something he was proud of and bragged about,
something important to his family, and something that senior Texas Air National Guard
officials had gone to great lengths to make possible. Therefore, Bush's "failure to
accomplish annual medical examination," could not have been either casual or
accidental.
Moreover, Bush had to have known that this suspension could subject him to a
punishment beyond just temporary suspension. In fact, Bush could have been permanently
suspended or even reprimanded for his actions.
Why would a physical exam present a problem for 1st Lt. Bush? A little-know fact
reported in the London Times and the New York Post on June 18, 2000 gives a powerful clue.
In April 1972 - the same month that Bush "gave up" flying - all the overseas and
stateside military services began subjecting a small random sample in their ranks to
substance abuse testing for alcohol and drugs. The Pentagon had announced its intention to
do so initially back on December 31, 1969. If Bush reported for his scheduled
physical in August 1972, he could have been subject to selection for a random substance
abuse test.
Bush's spokesman told the London Times that Bush "was not aware of any changes
that required a drug test." But this does not hold up under scrutiny. In 1969 - the
year following Bush's enlistment - the Pentagon notified every unit in the military that
it would implement random drug testing at some point in the near future. When that moment
arrived - April 1972 - every enlisted person and officer throughout the military, both
overseas and stateside, would have been aware of this dramatic change. After all, the
whole purpose of the random drug testing was to make it absolutely clear to everyone in
the Armed Forces that the Pentagon would not tolerate substance abuse of any kind by
anyone.
There is circumstantial evidence pointing to substance abuse by Bush during this
period. On the campaign trail, Bush has stated that he has not used drugs or alcohol in
excess since 1974. But this chronology makes it possible that he was in fact abusing one
or more of these substances in the summer of 1972.
Moreover, interviews with friends during this period reveal that Bush partied and
drank regularly, and Bush admits he was a hard drinker at the time. And over the Christmas
holidays, Bush got into a widely-reported emotional showdown with his father after taking
his 16-year-old brother Marvin drinking, hitting garbage cans while driving home.
Thus, the September 29 memo is a "smoking jet" which points to a
potentially devastating interpretation: that Bush stopped flying two years short of his
obligation because of substance abuse - either directly, because he failed his physical
exam, or indirectly, because he refused to take it out of fear that he would fail it.
Is it unreasonable to raise the possibility that 1st Lt. Bush was suspended from
flying as a direct or indirect consequence of substance abuse? It might be if there was no
way for Bush to prove his innocence. But George W. Bush can readily defend himself, if he
so chooses, simply by voluntarily releasing his complete military record.
A voluntary disclosure of this kind is not without precedent. During the South
Carolina Republican primary this campaign year, rumors were spread by fellow Senators
about Senator John McCain's mental health as a result of his imprisonment as a POW. McCain
immediately quashed those rumors by voluntarily releasing his entire military record,
which confirmed no indications of adverse physical or mental conditions.
Thus, Bush could easily put to rest the questions surrounding "his failure to
accomplish annual medical examination" - and his subsequent suspension - if he would
simply release his complete military service record, which cannot be released by the Air
Force without Bush's explicit consent.
2. Was a Flight Inquiry Board of senior Air Force officers convened to
determine the appropriate punishment for Bush's
misconduct?
Regardless of the explanation for Bush's suspension, there is another crucial
question: Was this suspension sufficient disciplinary action for such a flagrant
dereliction of duty at a time when the Air Force was reeling from a serious pilot shortage
at the peak of the Vietnam War?
In the Air National Guard, expensively trained pilots are not casually suspended.
There is normally a Flight Inquiry Board, which exercises the military chain of command's
obligation to insure due process. If one had been convened, its three senior officer
members would have documented why such a severe action was justified in relation to the
country's military objectives at the time, as opposed to the simple desire of a trained
pilot to just "give up flying".
In the event of serious misconduct, such as substance abuse, a Flight Inquiry Board
would have determined the appropriate punishment. The punishments could have included
temporary or permanent 'grounding,' a career-damaging letter of reprimand, forced
reenlistment in the US Army with active duty in Vietnam, or a less-than honorable
discharge.
In fact, there is no evidence now in the public domain that a Flight Inquiry Board
was convened to deal with Bush's official reclassification to a non-flying, grounded
status. However, the records of such a Board would not be subject to an ordinary FOIA
request because of privacy protections under FOIA.
This absence of a Flight Inquiry Board is of particular interest to veteran pilots
who are intimately familiar with normal disciplinary procedures. In the absence of Bush's
releasing his complete service record, the implication is that Bush's misconduct in
regards to "his failure to accomplish annual medical examination" was handled
like everything else in his military service: aided and abetted
by powerful family connections with total disregard for the needs of the military as well
as Bush's solemn oath.
Once again, the only way to get to the truth would be for George W. Bush to
personally request the release of his full military records.
3. Did Bush altogether dodge his subsequent scheduled Guard duty
obligations for two years after his grounding, and should he have received additional
punishment for this misconduct?
"I spent my time and I went to the Guard. It's just not true. I did the duty
necessary...any allegations other than that are simply not true." (George W. Bush,
May 23, 2000, CNN)
The questions about Bush's unfulfilled service record do not end with his suspension
and effective grounding on August 1, 1972. The central question for the remaining two
years is whether he fully and legitimately completed his original six-year attendance
obligation to the Texas Air Guard and his country, as sworn under oath upon his
enlistment, or if he simply dodged his remaining non-flying duties.
Bush has said repeatedly that he completed his service obligations. But a careful
review of his record tells a very different story.
On September 5, 1972, more than three months after his transfer request to an
inactive Alabama unit was refused,
Bush was finally ordered to start serving three months in an active but non-flying
administrative Guard unit, the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group in Montgomery, Alabama,
for four certain duty days in October and November.
Despite this direct written order, there is no official notation in his service
record that Bush ever showed up for any of this duty. General William Turnipseed and Lt.
Col. Kenneth Lott, who commanded the base at the time, told the Boston Globe that Bush
never appeared. "To my knowledge, he never showed up," Turnipseed said in May.
Bush insists he did, according to the Dallas Morning News. "I was there on
temporary assignment and fulfilled my weekends at one period of time. I made up some
missed weekends. I can't remember what I did, but I wasn't flying because they didn't have
the same airplanes. I fulfilled my obligations," he said while campaigning in Alabama
on June 23.
But the Bush campaign conducted its own search of Bush's military records, and could
not find evidence that Bush performed any duty in Alabama, the Dallas Morning News
reported. The only published reports were from personal friends who say they remember Bush
telling him that he planned to report for duty, but no reports of anyone in the Guard who
actually saw him. Moreover, Interceptor Magazine, a monthly official National Guard
publication distributed nationwide, ran advertisements asking for anyone to step forward
who remembered seeing Bush on duty. This inquiry came up empty-handed.
This raises the next question of whether 1st Lt. Bush was intentionally absent from
assigned duty contrary to a specific written order, which is the civilian/Guard Airman
equivalent of AWOL. This absence could normally result in disciplinary action beyond a
slap on the wrist by his parent Squadron's Commanding Officer.
When the three-month term of his apparently unfulfilled temporary order in Alabama
ended in November 1972, Bush returned home to Houston Texas until the fall of 1973.
However, he again did not report in person for non-flying duty to his parent Texas 111th
Squadron during this whole time.
Bush offers a different excuse for this period: that the 111th Squadron was
switching to a newer jet, so he could not fly. But the unit's commander told the Boston
Globe that Bush could have continued to fly the F-102, which remained in service in his
unit past the end of Bush's six-year commitment. "If [Bush] had come back to Houston,
I would have kept him flying the 102 until he got out," he said. "But I don't
recall him coming back at all." Given that this Commanding Officer used Bush
extensively for publicity and recruiting purposes during his flying days, it is unlikely
that he would have simply forgotten Bush from the day he wrote that Bush "cleared the
base" in May 1972.
Still, Bush reappeared on the Texas Air Guard's radar screen in May 1973. Bush was
ordered to attend nine certain duty days in person during Summer Camp at Ellington AFB
between May 22 and June 7. But 1st Lt. Bush did not do so - making him apparently absent
contrary to a specific written order for a second time in less than a year.
According to the Boston Globe, Bush "spent 36 days on duty" from May until
July of 1973, but this is a clear misunderstanding of the record. Our more recent FOIA
request produced an unsigned and undated one page listing of 35 inactive Reserve temporary
duty credit days starting May 25 through July 30, 1973. This document is a paper
confirmation that Bush did not actually report for duty in
person at the Texas Air National Guard on any of these days. In addition, no one in the
Texas Air Guard at the time, from the top command down, has stepped forward to say they
saw Bush in person on a single day between May 22 and July 30, 1973 - just as no one saw
Bush during his three month assignment in Alabama.
Instead, Bush in fact was credited with 35 "gratuitous" inactive Air Force
Reserve points - in other words, non-attendance inactive Reserve credit time. The proof
that this time was "gratuitous" is the absence of any Bush duty time of any kind
on his official Texas Air National Guard record all the way from the May 26 1972 entry of
22 pilot duty days for the prior year. This is because "gratuitous"
time does not count as scheduled Texas Air Guard duty. This leaves Bush without a single
legitimate Texas Air National Guard service day for his fifth and sixth years of service
to his Texas Air National Guard discharge on October 1, 1973 - a critical fact that has
been misunderstood in several previous reports of this period of Bush's service.
On October 1, 1973 - fully eight months short of his full six-year service
obligation and scheduled discharge on May 26, 1974 - Bush was prematurely discharged with
honors from the Texas Air Guard, in spite of his failure to report in person for any for
duty over the prior 18 months. This is the very last entry on his official half-page Texas
Air Guard service record. Another Reserve archive record released under our FOIA request
goes on to indicate eventual final inactive Reserve discharge with honors in November
1974, but civilian Bush was attending Harvard Business School as a full-time student by
that time.
There was no record received under our FOIA request that indicate any more Reserve
credit beyond July 30, 1973. This is also puzzling, but does not add any further insight
into the fractured Texas Air National Guard attendance pattern after April 1972.
Conclusion
Anyone seeking to be President of the United States and its Commander in Chief, and
who has campaigned specifically on a promise to restore honor and integrity to the office,
strengthen the military, and tell the plain truth, should be prepared to discuss his past
record of service to his country. Candidate Bush has a duty to the American people, as
well as his fellow military comrades-in-arms, to fully and accurately answer all of these
grave questions about his exceedingly convenient and prematurely short military service.
Bush's available service records raise very serious
questions that reflect heavily on his qualifications for President. By disclosing the full
contents of his official service record, Bush could clear up the cloud of questions that
still linger 32 years after his first oath to the United States.
END QUOTE
|